Sunday, September 21, 2014

Angela Carter and the Power of the New Weird


The concept of weird as we know it today has it’s roots in Shakespeare’s Macbeth. In Macbeth the Weird Sisters, also known as the Three Witches, controlled the destiny of the protagonists through the powers of fate. These great powers were of mystical, otherworldly origins, hence the idea of weird as unnatural, strange or not of everyday experience. In the modern usage weird is often used as a kind of pejorative, employed to quarantine those outliers who operate independent from the status quo. Many artists have re-appropriated this term, elevating it to a loose sub-genre of works in the so-called “New Weird”. These artists exalt the ambiguous experiences separated from the everyday to dig into the least comfortable realties of human nature. These works are often characterized by an unexpected point of view and contain surrealist motifs as a means to delve into the workings of the subconscious mind.           

Angela Carter explores weirdness extensively in her novel Nights at the Circus.  In Nights at the Circus journalist Jack Walser becomes obsessed with the truth behind the life of Sophie Fevvers an orphan girl turned circus performer who has allegedly sprouted a set of giant wings from her back. Carter plays with our preconceived notions around the characters in the story. As we are swept into Fevver’s elaborate narrative, the weird aspects of the so-called “Freaks” are rendered as mundane with the details of their everyday life and down-to-earth personalities. However their experiences amongst the supposedly ordinary populous stand out in stark relief for their strangeness and cruelty.

The setting in Nights at the Circus is the true source of the stories strangeness. The circus setting appears in various incarnations; firstly through Jack’s point of view in London, then through a more fluid narration as we follow the circus across Russia. Through Fevver’s narrative we learn of the brothel where she was raised. In the brothel Fevver’s wings did not alarm the other women, rather they saw Fevvers as a beacon of hope, a physical symbol of their moral separation from the rest of the world as a result of their profession. The last place Fevver’s describes to Jack is her stay in Madame Schreck’s house of horrors. Schreck’s house is by far the most exaggeratedly cruel and shocking example of how people are treated when they are made to be the mysterious other by exploitative forces. Throughout Carter’s story we are faced with this dichotomy of the freak or the whore versus the normal, freaks and whores in this case being interchangeable stand-ins for the moral other in society.


What makes Nights at the Circus and similar works in the “New Weird” so intriguing is not necessarily what they say but what they deliberately occlude. Jack casts his shadows of doubt over Fevver’s story from the very first sentence. Although Jack is eventually swayed by Fevver’s tale the audience is left largely in doubt. The narration from her point of view is never completely stable, in contrast to Jack’s journalistic grounding in objective fact, Fevver’s narration makes constant jumps, and the audience never feels completely satisfied with her explanations. The use of mundane elements lull the reader into a sense of security then the surreal aspects of the work take hold and the reader is plunged into a parallel world that is uncannily like their own. Ambiguity is a vital ingredient to weird. There is always a sneaking suspicion that something is ‘just a little bit off’. The subjectivity inherent in the “New Weird” forces the audience to engage with the work on their own terms, as a reflection of their own perception of reality.


No comments:

Post a Comment